TIGblogs TIG | TIGblogs GROUP TIGBLOGS LOGIN SIGNUP
Richard Graves's Blog
Richard Graves's Blog
Proposed Nukes in FL=$1000s in Rate Hikes! yikes!


I’ve known for years that nuclear power is really expensive, and as a resident of Tennessee who gets my electricity from Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA), I’m aware of and quite frustrated by their $22+ billion debt for past nuclear reactors, many of which were not even completed. I day dream about what TVA would look like if even half of this was instead invested in conservation, efficiency and renewable energy programs–I’m thinking cleaner air, cleaner & cooler water, lower bills. But, until last week, I had not seen a break down of the direct impact of constructing new nuclear reactors on electric rates for consumers. I have included a chart from the Florida Public Service Commission staff memo issued on July 2, 2008 listing the projected monthly bill increase for the next 9 years of the construction of two 1000 MW reactors by Progress Energy in Levy County, Florida. This is crazy! Progress Energy’s electric ratepayers in Florida would end up paying an additional $1640 in the next seven years before the plant is even online and producing electricity and then $789 in the next two years as the 2 plants come online. That’s more than $2400 per customer on average over nine years.
FL Public Service Commission Estimate for Monthly Rate Hikes for New Nukes
The total estimate for the two reactors is around $17 billion!! Imagine if we invested even half of this into energy efficiency and renewable energy instead of new nuclear energy. This cost is in addition to over $18 billion in loan guarantees for new nuclear power that Congress approved in late 2007, since Wall Street won’t invest in new nukes. Dollar for dollar energy efficiency and renewables give us much higher carbon emissions reductions much quicker than new nuclear power and in the long term the sun, the wind and not using energy are FREE! (see chart at the end of this post) meaning that rate payers’ bills will more likely stay the same or even drop versus projections like these. To see the clean energy future that we want, we must stop these new plants and shift these HUGE investments (or even half of these investments, saving the rest) to clean, renewable energies creating green jobs, cleaner air, cleaner water and no nuclear waste! Sign the Power Vote pledge for a future of no coal, no nukes and green jobs and get more involved in the fights against these expensive and dirty plants.

Check out this chart from Amory Lovins and Imran Sheikh called “The Nuclear Illusion” about CO2 emissions displaces by dollar spent on different technologies.


July 29, 2008 | 11:07 AM Comments  0 comments

You must be logged in to add tags.


Richard Graves's Profile

Richard Graves's Friends


Latest Posts
Greenpeace banner on...
Chesapeake Bay: Speake...
L’Aquila – G8/MEF...
Iquitos Protest...
New Climate Bill Could...

Monthly Archive
January 2008
February 2008
March 2008
April 2008
May 2008
June 2008
July 2008
August 2008
September 2008
October 2008
November 2008
December 2008
January 2009
February 2009
March 2009
April 2009
May 2009
June 2009
July 2009

My Group Blogs
Climate Change

Change Language


Tags Archive
actlocally americas campuses climatechallenge climatechange climatejustice climatepolicy coal coalcampaign corporateresponsibility directaction dirtyenergy economics events globalwarming government greenforall greenjobs impactedcommunities jobs newsandmedia oil politicalparticipation politics powervote renewableenergy unitedstates video visioning youthleaders

Filter By Type
Topics

Friends
Adam MacIsaac
It's Getting Hot In Here
Joanna Dafoe
Josh Darrach
Liz McDowell
Nick Moraitis
P.J. Partington

Links
It's Getting Hot in Here


306230 views
Important Disclaimer